Editorial Board

Biotational is led by a committed editor and emerging editorial board focused on open-access, reproducible publishing in computational science.

We uphold rigorous peer review standards and ethical compliance aligned with COPE and open science best practices.

Editor-in-Chief

Wale Fagbamila
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
BSc in Biological Sciences – University of Essex
United Kingdom
info@biotational.com

Wale is the founding editor of Biotational and leads the journal’s peer review process, editorial decision-making, and platform development. He brings a background in environmental data, regulatory compliance, and interdisciplinary science communication. His vision for Biotational is to build a dynamic and transparent publishing space for emerging and established computational researchers.

Editorial Responsibilities

The Editorial Board is responsible for:

  • Reviewing submissions and coordinating external peer review
  • Making editorial decisions (accept, revise, reject)
  • Ensuring compliance with publishing ethics and data standards
  • Advising on scope, direction, and outreach of the journal
  • Supporting the quality, discoverability, and openness of published content

Editorial Expansion in Progress

Biotational is actively forming its editorial board and peer reviewer network.

If you’re a researcher, reviewer, or academic professional in the field of computational science, we welcome expressions of interest. Contributors may assist with:

  • Peer reviewing submissions
  • Co-editing special issues
  • Advising on platform strategy

To express interest in joining the board or reviewer pool, contact us at info@biotational.com

Our Review Model

Biotational uses a single-blind peer review process for all submitted research. Reviews are managed by the Editor-in-Chief and external subject experts. Reviewers assess submissions for originality, clarity, and scientific integrity.

Single-blind peer review model, where reviewers know the identity of the authors, but authors do not know who the reviewers are. This allows reviewers to give honest, unbiased feedback while protecting their anonymity.

Related Pages: